Today’s seminar speaker was Todd Castoe from the University of Texas at Arlington where I did my Ph.D.  While Todd wasn’t on my committee my office when I was a grad student was directly across the hall from Todd, so it was great to catch up with him.  His talk was titled: Genome-wide evidence for perturbed systems as hotspots for adaptation.  Writ large this was a talk about convergence and the topography of the adaptive landscape.

The idea of adaptive landscapes is perhaps one of the oldest metaphors in evolutionary biology.  For Todd’s talk we will consider the high points in these landscapes as phenotypic combinations that provide high fitness and the pathway followed to travel between peaks as the evolutionary changes responsible for moving between peaks. 

Two alternative adaptive landscapes:


Here the adaptive landscape has many peaks and there are many potential pathways to reach any of these many peaks



In contrast there could be only one reasonable path between only a handful of local optima

We generate expectations for convergence under each of the above conceptions of the adaptive landscape.  In the first we would expect convergence at the phenotypic level to be relatively more common than the actual underlying molecular changes responsible for the phenotypes.  In contrast in the second case some form of constraint limits the pathways that can be used to move from one optima to another and we should expect phenotypic and molecular convergence to be more common.

Todd began his talk by suggesting that increasing evidence (including a great example of mitochondrial convergence in squamate reptiles) points to an adaptive landscape that is highly constrained and more like the second metaphorical picture.

Todd then showed us a variety of projects that his lab is working on that may shed light on the nature of this landscape and the nature of convergence.  For the sake of brevity I’m going to talk about just one of these. 

This project is a story centered on the amazing physiology of the Burmese python.  In its natural habitat the Burmese python often feeds very rarely but consumes meals that may mass as much as 50% of the snake’s mass.  After these large feedings the snake may fast for many months.  This pattern of large meals followed by long fasting is not unique to Burmese pythons and is also present in some of the large vipers.  The amazing part of this story though is the energy saving solution these large snakes have found.   During fasting periods the snakes have evolved to lose much of the physiological structure necessary for the digestion of these meals.  The snakes exhibit massive losses in the size of organs for instance the heart, liver, and kidneys, and they even lose some structure within organs.  For instance, microvilli in the small intestine are lost during fasting periods.  These adaptations allow the snake to achieve some of the lowest metabolic rates measured in vertebrates during fasting periods, but return to more typical metabolic levels after feeding.  The phylogenetic distribution of these traits suggests that some of the necessary machinery for this physiological remodeling is likely quite ancient and has been fine tuned or loss in contemporary clades.

The Castoe lab is now doing exciting work looking at the evolution of introduced Burmese python populations in Florida.  There are many differences in the environment that the invasive populations are living in.  The obvious and well documented difference is low temperatures.  For instance winter mortality appears to be as high as 40-90% in the invasive population.  Because of this it was expected that genome scans would reveal selection on genes important in cold tolerance.  Genome scans revealed that approximately 80 genes show strong signs of selection in this invasive population.  But, genes important in cold tolerance only accounted for a fraction (approximately 10%) of these 80.  What did the rest of the genes under selection look like?  Preliminary results suggest that the majority are those genes that have already been identified as being important in the evolution of physiological remodeling.  Why would these genes suddenly come under selection?  It ends up that in Florida prey items are abundant year round and snakes that do not remodel their organs may have higher fitness.  The story then may be a particularly fascinating version of convergent evolution where this introduced population is converging on a phenotype of its ancestor.  Returning to the analogy of adaptive landscapes at the beginning of the post then we would be seeing something like this:


  When we look at the Burmese python in Florida we are seeing a lineage that has used largely the same system of genes to move from no physiological remodeling to physiological remodeling and now back again… effectively converging on an ancestral phenotype and using the same pathway to do it!

Todd covered an impressive body of work in his talk and any mistakes or unjustified extrapolations are likely my own.  Below are links to some of the papers from his lab that focus on these topics:




















Great Blogs
Great Blogs
About Me
About Me
My Photo
I am broadly interested in the application and development of comparative methods to better understand genome evolution at all scales from nucleotides to chromosomes.
Subscribe
Subscribe
Loading
Dynamic Views theme. Powered by Blogger. Report Abuse.